Workforce Development Ratings and Data
A description of the Workforce Development scoring methodology and the meaning of categorical ratings displayed below are available in evidence-based frameworks.
Please Wait.......
A description of the Workforce Development scoring methodology and the meaning of categorical ratings displayed below are available in evidence-based frameworks.
|
|||||
|
Chad
Country Report 2014 |
|||||
|
|
Emerging |
||||
| |
Emerging |
||||
|
Chad |
|||||
| Advocacy for WfD to Support Economic Development |
EMERGING |
||||
| Are there visible champions advocating for WfD to support economic development? | Non | ||||
| Who are the champions of WfD in government? | Autres - donnez les détails : | ||||
| Which of the following best describes the advocacy exercised by the above champions? | Un plaidoyer ad hoc ou peu soutenu | ||||
| Who are the non-government champions of WfD? | Chefs d'entreprises ou de fédérations professionnelles | ||||
| Which of the following best describes the advocacy exercised by the non-government champions? | Un plaidoyer ad hoc ou peu soutenu | ||||
| How do the champions for WfD engage in dialogue on the WfD policy agenda? | En passant parfois par des dispositifs institutionnalisés | ||||
| Has advocacy and dialogue among the champions led to collaboration on the WfD policy agenda? | Oui, à une collaboration autour d'une politique stratégique globale du DMO | ||||
| Strategic Focus and Decisions by the WfD Champions |
ESTABLISHED |
||||
| Which of the following broad areas for WfD have the champions emphasized as priorities to support economic and social development: | Enseignement post-secondaire | ||||
| Which of the following more specific areas for WfD have the champions emphasized as priorities to support economic and social development: | Formation professsionnelle initiale aux niveaux secondaire et post-secondaire, Formations ciblées aux populations vulnérables (ex. chômeurs, femmes, jeunes à risque) | ||||
| Regarding the more specific areas, have the champions for WfD made strategic decisions over the last five years? | Oui | ||||
| What did the strategic decisions consist of? | Lancement d'initiatives pour la mise en oeuvre des mesures prioritaires de la politique du DMO (ex. commission, établissement, programme) | ||||
| How are the WfD champions monitoring implementation progress of the above strategic decisions? | Suivi ou examen ad hoc (ex. lors de la publication d'un rapport ad hoc) | ||||
| |
Latent |
||||
|
Chad |
|||||
| Overall Assessment of Economic Prospects and Skills Implications |
LATENT |
||||
| Has there been a formal assessment(s) of the country's economic prospects and their implications for skills? | Non | ||||
| What is the nature of the studies and assessments? | |||||
| What is the scope of the assessment(s): | |||||
| Please indicate all sources of data that informed the assessment(s): | |||||
| Please select all parties that sponsor or conduct these studies and assessments: | |||||
| Critical Skills Constraints in Priority Economic Sectors |
LATENT |
||||
| List below three of the country's priority economic sectors: | Agriculture, élevage | ||||
| Have the government or WfD stakeholders identified critical skills constraints in these priority sectors? | Non | ||||
| How were the skills constraints identified in these priority sectors? | |||||
| What describes the key measures being taken to address skills constraints in these priority sectors? | |||||
| Are the previously identified WfD champions closely associated with the above key measures to address skills constraints in the priority sectors? | Oui, dans une certaine mesure | ||||
| Role of Employers and Industry |
EMERGING |
||||
| Do employers and industry have a role in defining strategic WfD priorities for the country or region? | Oui | ||||
| How do employers and industry provide inputs in setting strategic WfD priorities? | Seulement par des réunions et autres mecanismes ad hoc | ||||
| List two major policy or investment decisions with WfD implications in the past three years that have benefitted from employer and industry input: | N/A | ||||
| In what ways are employers and industry helping to address the skills implications of the above two policy/investment decisions? | |||||
| What best describes the depth of engagement by employers and industry in the areas selected above? | Engagement limité | ||||
| Skills-upgrading Incentives for Employers |
EMERGING |
||||
| Does the government provide incentives for formal sector employers to develop and upgrade skills? | Oui | ||||
| Does the country have a levy-grant scheme for training for formal sector employers? | Oui, qui bénéficie à la plupart des employeurs | ||||
| Is an annual report publicly available on the operations of the levy-grant scheme? | Non | ||||
| What other government incentives for skills upgrading exist for formal sector employers? | Appui spécifique aux petites et moyennes entreprises (ex. guichet unique) | ||||
| Identify two major programs benefitting formal sector employers that feature the incentives listed above: | |||||
| Does the government provide support for informal sector businesses to develop and upgrade skills? | Oui | ||||
| What government support for skills upgrading is provided for informal sector businesses? | Programmes de formation (ex. artisanat, entrepreneuriat) | ||||
| Identify two major programs benefitting informal sector businesses that feature the government support listed above: | programme de formation par apprentissage en mécanique, programme de formation à la gestion et à l'entrepreneuriat de la petite/micro entreprise | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Monitoring of the Incentive Programs | |||||
| Name of Program 1: | |||||
| Date started: | |||||
| Has this program been reviewed for impact on skills and productivity? | |||||
| Is the review process systematic and routine? | |||||
| Please provide the date of the last review below: | |||||
| What best describes the follow-up to the review? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this program: | |||||
| Name of Program 2: | |||||
| Date started: | |||||
| Has this program been reviewed for impact on skills and productivity? | |||||
| Is the review process systematic and routine? | |||||
| Please provide the date of the last review below: | |||||
| What best describes the follow-up to the review? | |||||
| |
Emerging |
||||
|
Chad |
|||||
| Roles of Government Ministries and Agencies |
EMERGING |
||||
| Which of the following have legally-defined roles and responsibilities for WfD? | 40969, 41183, Non , Ministère chargé de l'éducation, Autres ministères - donnez les détails :, Le CFPP (Centre de Formation Professionnelle et de Perfectionnement) de la Chambre de Commerce; | ||||
| What best describes the degree of overlap in the mandates of the above entities? | Il s'agit de fonctions qui se recoupent dans peu de domaines | ||||
| Do mechanisms exist to ensure coordination of WfD strategies and programs across ministries and agencies? | Oui, des mécanismes institutionnalisés | ||||
| Roles of Non-Government WfD Stakeholders |
ESTABLISHED |
||||
| Do non-government WfD stakeholders have legally-defined roles and responsibilities? | Oui | ||||
| Which of the following non-government WfD stakeholders have legally-defined roles and responsibilities? | Fédérations professionnelles, Opérateurs de formation professionnelle | ||||
| Do mechanisms exist for coordination between government entities and non-government WfD stakeholders? | Oui, des mécanismes institutionnalisés | ||||
| Coordination for the Implementation of Strategic WfD Measures |
EMERGING |
||||
| Please list two major initiatives or programs closely associated with the previously identified WfD champions that address skills constraints in the priority economic sectors | Mise en place des chantiers-écoles, La formation par apprentissage en mécanique | ||||
| Please answer the following questions for the more important of the above two measures. | |||||
| Is the above measure accompanied by an implementation plan? | |||||
| Is the above measure accompanied by a budget allocation? | |||||
| Indicate below all key entities with responsibility for implementing the above measure: | |||||
| How do the above entities coordinate the implementation of the above measure? | |||||
| How is implementation progress for this measure monitored? | |||||
| Have the most successful features of this measure been mainstreamed into the formal WfD system? | |||||
|
|
Emerging |
||||
| |
Latent |
||||
|
Chad |
|||||
| Overview of Funding for WfD | |||||
| How does the government mobilize funds for WfD? | Autre :, Ministère chargé de l'éducation, Ministère chargé des finances, Par une taxe professionnelle réservée à une agence paragouvernementale autonome (ex. www.SENAI.br [Brésil]), Commentaires sur le processus de prise de décisions, le cas échéant :, Fiscalité générale, L'Etat peut financer la formation professionnelle sur ses fonds qui proviennent de la fiscalité générale et d'autres sources autorisées. | ||||
| Which of the following types of training receive financial support from the government? | Formation professionnelle initiale (FPI), Formation professionnelle continue (FPC) (ex. formation en milieu professionnel, orientation professionnelle) | ||||
| For decisions on capital investments by the government, which ministry(s) is directly responsible? | Ministère chargé de l'éducation, Ministère chargé de l'équipement | ||||
| Initial Vocational Education and Training (IVET) | |||||
| Continuing Vocational Education and Training (CVET) | |||||
| Training-related active labor market programs (ALMPs) | |||||
| For decisions on spending on salaries (including hiring decisions), which ministry is directly responsible? | |||||
| Initial Vocational Education and Training (IVET) | |||||
| Continuing Vocational Education and Training (CVET) | |||||
| Training-related active labor market programs (ALMPs) | |||||
| For decisions on non-salary operational spending to deliver training services, which ministry is directly responsible? | Ministère chargé de l'éducation, Ministère chargé des finances | ||||
| Initial Vocational Education and Training (IVET), if relevant | |||||
| Continuing Vocational Education and Training (CVET), if relevant | |||||
| Training-related active labor market programs (ALMPs), if relevant | |||||
| What is the main mechanism used by the government to provide recurrent funding for training? | |||||
| Initial Vocational Education and Training (IVET), if relevant | Par une affectation budgétaire (ex. en faveur des opérateurs de formation, des entreprises ayant accueilli des apprentis, etc.) | ||||
| Continuing Vocational Education and Training (CVET), if relevant | |||||
| Training-related Active Labor Market Programs (ALMPs), if relevant | |||||
| Recurrent Funding for Initial Vocational Education and Training (IVET) [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| Which of the following best describes the ministry's budget process for funding IVET institutions and programs? | |||||
| What criteria are used to determine funding allocation to IVET institutions and programs? | |||||
| Are the criteria for allocating WfD funding to institutions and programs subject to periodic review? | |||||
| Provide two examples of major reforms in the last five years to improve efficiency and equity in funding allocations: | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Recurrent Funding for Continuing Vocational Education and Training Programs (CVET) |
EMERGING |
||||
| Indicate below the ministries or agencies responsible for CVET, listing the lead entity first: | Ministère en charge de l'emploi à travers l'ONAPE (Office National pour la Promotion des Emplois), Ministère du Plan à travers le FONAP (Fonds National d'Appui à la Formation Professionnelle) | ||||
| How is recurrent funding for CVET programs decided? | Seuls les cadres du ministère ou de l'agence responsable, Par une procédure formelle comportant des phases de demande et de validation | ||||
| Are training providers provided with incentives to seek and to retain accreditation? | |||||
| Does the ministry or agency produce an annual report? | Mais, mais seulement pour usage interne | ||||
| What is the latest year for which the report is available? | le rapport du FONAP n'a jamais été publié | ||||
| Please name two on-going or recent government-supported programs to foster on-the-job training (OJT) in small and medium sized firms (SMEs): | Non | ||||
| Have these programs been reviewed for their impact? | |||||
| Have the reviews led to changes in program funding or design? | |||||
| Please name two on-going or recent programs to support individual career or professional development (e.g. reskilling or upgrading skills): | |||||
| Have these programs been reviewed for their impact? | Non | ||||
| Have the reviews led to changes in program funding or design? | |||||
| Recurrent Funding for Training-related Active Labor Market Programs (ALMPs) |
ESTABLISHED |
||||
| Indicate below the ministries or agencies responsible for training-related ALMPs, listing the lead entity first: | Ministère en charge de l'emploi à travers l'ONAPE (Office National pour la Promotion des Emplois), Ministère du Plan à travers le FONAP (Fonds National d'Appui à la Formation Professionnelle) | ||||
| Who are the beneficiaries of training-related ALMPs supported by government funding? | |||||
| Please indicate two major training-related ALMPs supported by government funding: | Par une procédure ad hoc , Mise en place des chantiers-écoles, La formation par apprentissage en mécanique | ||||
| How is funding for the above two programs decided? | |||||
| Who is involved in this process? | |||||
| How is training provision implemented? | Non , Le ministère ou l'agence offre la formation par le biais d'opérateurs privés présélectionnés. | ||||
| Have these programs been formally reviewed for their impact? | |||||
| Have the reviews led to changes in program funding or design? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Equity in Funding for Training Programs (IVET) |
LATENT |
||||
| In the last five years, has there been a formal review(s) of the impact of WfD funding on the beneficiaries of training programs? | |||||
| Please provide two examples of reviews conducted in the last five years: | |||||
| Which of the following outcomes by socioeconomic group did the review(s) consider? | |||||
| Which of the following parties participated in dialogue on the findings of the above review(s) and their implications: | |||||
| What has been the follow-up to the above review(s)? | |||||
| Equity in Funding for Training Programs (CVET) |
LATENT |
||||
| Continuing Vocational Education and Training (CVET) | |||||
| In the last five years, has there been a formal review(s) of the impact of WfD funding on the beneficiaries of training programs? | |||||
| Please provide two examples of reviews conducted in the last five years: | |||||
| Which of the following outcomes by socioeconomic group did the review(s) consider? | |||||
| Which of the following parties participated in dialogue on the findings of the above review(s) and their implications: | |||||
| What has been the follow-up to the above review(s)? | |||||
| Notes, if any: | |||||
| Equity in Funding for Training Programs (ALMPs) |
LATENT |
||||
| Training-related Active Labor Market Programs (ALMPs) | |||||
| In the last five years, has there been a formal review(s) of the impact of WfD funding on the beneficiaries of training programs? | |||||
| Please provide two examples of reviews conducted in the last five years: | |||||
| Which of the following outcomes by socioeconomic group did the review(s) consider? | |||||
| Which of the following parties participated in dialogue on the findings of the above review(s) and their implications: | |||||
| What has been the follow-up to the above review(s)? | |||||
| Partnerships between Training Providers and Employers |
LATENT |
||||
| Does the government facilitate such partnerships through formal arrangements? | Non | ||||
| At what levels have the partnerships been institutionalized? | |||||
| What benefits do the participating employers get from partnerships with training providers? | |||||
| Please name below two major employers, and the resources that they provide for WfD: | |||||
| Name of Employer 1, please indicate below: | |||||
| What resources does this employer provide? | |||||
| Name of Employer 2, please indicate below: | |||||
| What resources does this employer provide? | |||||
| |
Emerging |
||||
|
Chad |
|||||
| Competency Standards and National Qualifications Frameworks |
EMERGING |
||||
| Indicate below the ministries or agencies, if any, with oversight responsibility for competency standards and/or the national qualifications framework (NQF), listing the lead entity first | RAS | ||||
| Have competency standards for occupations been defined? | Oui, pour quelques métiers | ||||
| Is a national qualifications framework (NQF) in place? | Non | ||||
| What is the occupational coverage of the NQF? | |||||
| What range of skill levels does the NQF cover? | |||||
| Which of the following parties are involved in policy dialogue on competency standards and/or the NQF? | |||||
| What best characterizes the policy dialogue on competency standards and/or the NQF? | |||||
| Competency Standards for Major Occupations |
LATENT |
||||
| Please indicate two major skilled or semi-skilled occupations (i.e. dominant or fastest-growing): | |||||
| Occupation 1: | |||||
| Who is involved in setting the competency standards? | |||||
| Do training providers for this occupation utilize competency-based curricula aligned to the standards formally agreed upon by the above stakeholders? | |||||
| Occupation 2: | |||||
| Who is involved in setting the competency standards? | |||||
| Do training providers for this occupation utilize competency-based curricula as defined by standards formally agreed upon by the above stakeholders? | |||||
| Occupational Skills Testing |
EMERGING |
||||
| Is competency-based testing used to certify qualifications in skilled and semi-skilled occupations? | Non | ||||
| Which of the following describes the system for competency-based testing? | |||||
| Indicate below the ministry(s) or agency(s) with oversight responsibility for competency-based testing, listing the lead entity first: | |||||
| Which of the following best describes the volume of testing administered by the lead entity? | |||||
| Has the above entity taken measures in the last three years to manage the cost of skills testing and certification? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Skills Testing and Certification |
ESTABLISHED |
||||
| List below two of the most common certificates (exclude those required for licensing): | |||||
| What best describes the public's confidence in the above certificates? | |||||
| Certificate 1: | |||||
| Certificate 2: | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Skills Testing for Major Occupations |
EMERGING |
||||
| List two major skilled or semi-skilled occupations (i.e. dominant or fastest-growing): | |||||
| Occupation 1: | |||||
| What best describes the focus of the tests? | |||||
| Is a certificate awarded upon successful completion of the tests? | |||||
| Is a certificate required for practitioners of this occupation? | |||||
| Does having a certificate improve employability and earnings in this occupation? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on skills testing for occupation 1: | |||||
| Occupation 2: | |||||
| What best describes the focus of the tests? | |||||
| Is a certificate awarded upon successful completion of the tests? | |||||
| Is a certificate required for practitioners of this occupation? | |||||
| Does having a certificate improve employment and earnings in this occupation? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on skills testing for occupation 2: | |||||
| Government Oversight of Accreditation | |||||
| Accreditation of Training Providers | |||||
| Is a system in place to accredit training providers? | |||||
| Please indicate the government ministries or agencies that exercise this function: | |||||
| Accreditation of Training Programs | |||||
| Is a system in place to accredit training programs? | |||||
| Please indicate the government ministries or agencies that exercise this function: | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Establishment of Accreditation Standards [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| What entity establishes the accreditation standards for training providers? | Une unité désignée au sein du ministère est chargée de cette fonction. | ||||
| How does the above entity establish accreditation standards for training providers? | Sur des consultations internes seulement | ||||
| Are accreditation standards periodically reviewed? | Oui, de manière ad hoc | ||||
| Do these protocols involve formal input from external bodies? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Accreditation Requirements and Enforcement of Accreditation Standards [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| What types of providers are required to obtain accreditation? | |||||
| Are accredited providers required to renew their accreditation status on a regular basis? | Non, Pour tous les operateurs, quelle que soit la source de financement | ||||
| Are accreditation standards publicized? | |||||
| Are accreditation standards enforced? | Oui , Oui, mais de manière limitée | ||||
| Why are accreditation standards not enforced? | |||||
| Incentives and Support for Accreditation [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| Are training providers provided with incentives to seek and to retain accreditation? | |||||
| What types of incentives are provided to training providers? | Oui | ||||
| Are training providers provided with support to seek and to retain accreditation? | Non , L'accréditation est un critère d'éligibilité à l'obtention d'un permis d'exploitation. | ||||
| What type of support is provided to training providers? | |||||
| |
Emerging |
||||
|
Chad |
|||||
| Learning Pathways [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| Are separate academic and vocational/technical streams offered at the secondary level? | Oui | ||||
| In what year of schooling does the streaming begin? | A partir de la fin du premier cycle de l'enseignement secondaire (après 8 à 10 années d'enseignement) ? | ||||
| What are the options for technical and vocational education and training at the post-secondary level? | Autres - donnez les détails :, Instituts supérieurs d'enseignement technique [ISET], instituts universitaires de technologie [IUT], collèges communautaires [CC], Etablissements universitaires ayant des filières professionnelles et techniques, Universités spécialisées | ||||
| Can graduates of secondary vocational/technical streams progress to post-secondary levels of study? | Oui, dans un programme de formation professionnelle ou technique OU dans un programme d'enseignement général | ||||
| Can graduates of post-secondary vocational/technical programs (e.g. polytechnics, community colleges) progress to university programs? | Oui, mais seulement dans quelques programmes | ||||
| Public Perception of Pathways for TVET [*] |
ESTABLISHED |
||||
| Has the government taken action to improve public perception of TVET? | Oui | ||||
| What do these actions consist of? | Améliorer la qualité et l'adéquation des programmes | ||||
| Regarding diversifying pathways, has the government taken major actions in the last 10 years? | Non | ||||
| List two of the most important of these government actions to diversify pathways: | |||||
| Have these actions been monitored or reviewed for their impact on diversifying learning pathways? | |||||
| What best describes the review process? | |||||
| Has the above review led to changes in policies to diversify learning pathways? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Articulation of Skills Certification [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| Are certificates awarded for completing technical/vocational training programs recognized in the national qualifications framework? | Non | ||||
| Do training providers under ministries other than Education offer programs leading to the award of formal qualifications? | Oui | ||||
| Are the qualifications awarded by non-Education ministries recognized for admission into formal education and training programs under the Ministry of Education? | Non | ||||
| List below five common qualifications awarded by non-Education ministries that are recognized for admission into formal education and training programs under the Ministry of Education: | |||||
| List below the qualifications from above that are recognized with the granting of credit: | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Recognition of Prior Learning [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| How have policy makers addressed issues pertaining to the recognition of prior learning (RPL)? | Avec une certaine attention (ex. études, dialogue national) | ||||
| Does a national organization exist dedicated to adult learning and related issues (e.g. recognition of prior learning)? | Oui, il existe une organisation nationale (ex. www.ial.edu.sg [Singapour], eng.krivet.re.kr [Corée], www.ina.ac.cr [Costa Rica]). | ||||
| Is recognition of prior learning (RPL) integrated into the national qualifications framework (NQF) or the framework for occupational competency standards? | Non | ||||
| What best describes the government's outreach to inform the public about the recognition of prior learning? | 1. Limited or no outreach | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Support for Further Occupational and Career Development [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| Indicate below the ministries or agencies that provide or fund services to support further occupational and career development: | Office National pour la Promotion de l'Emploi | ||||
| What describes the scope of publicly-sponsored further occupational and career development services? | Un nombre limité de services est offert. | ||||
| What describes the organization of the above services? | |||||
| In the last five years, has the government reviewed its policies or programs for further occupational and career development? | Oui | ||||
| Was the above review part of a routine and institutionalized process? | Non | ||||
| Has the above review led to changes in policies, funding, or the design of services for further occupational and career development? | Adoption et mise en œuvre d'un nouvel organigramme de l'Office National pour la Promotion de l'Emploi, avec un "service d'orientation mieux étoffé" | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Training-related Provision of Services for the Disadvantaged [*] |
ESTABLISHED |
||||
| Are publicly-funded training programs available for disadvantaged populations? | Oui | ||||
| Indicate below the ministries or agencies that oversee the above programs, listing the lead entity first: | |||||
| How does the lead ministry or agency support publicly-funded training programs for disadvantaged populations? | Est fourni un appui ad hoc, en réponse à des demandes spécifiques, au cas par cas. | ||||
| Please indicate below the nature of the systematic support: | |||||
| Indicate below two major programs addressing the training needs of disadvantaged populations: | Programme de formation par apprentissage en soins esthétiques/ coiffure, programme d'alphabétisation des adultes pour favoriser leur participation à la économique et culturelle du pays | ||||
| Have these programs been monitored and reviewed for impact? | Non | ||||
| Are these reviews part of an institutionalized and routine practice? | |||||
| Following these reviews, have the programs been adjusted in light of the findings? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
|
|
Latent |
||||
| |
Emerging |
||||
|
Chad |
|||||
| Scope and Formality of Non-State Training Provision [*] |
ESTABLISHED |
||||
| Are non-state providers allowed to offer training? (e.g. IVET, CVET, training-related ALMPs) | Oui | ||||
| What types of non-state providers are allowed to offer training? | Opérateurs nationaux à but non lucratif | ||||
| What best describes the composition of training providers? | Le secteur est composé d'opérateurs de type divers | ||||
| Does an association of private training providers exist? | Oui | ||||
| Briefly describe this association's membership, governance structure, and its role in policy dialogue with the government: | Cette association a été créée octobre 2013. Elle dispose d'une assemblée générale qui est l'organe suprême de décisions et d'orientations et d'un Bureau Exécutif constitué de onze (11) membres dont un Président et son vice-président, un secrétaire exécuti | ||||
| What best describes the registration status of non-state training providers? | Non, La plupart des opérateurs sont enregistrés. | ||||
| Are non-state providers required to renew their registration on a regular basis? | |||||
| What best describes the licensing status of non-state training providers? | Non, La plupart des opérateurs possèdent un permis d'exploitation. | ||||
| Are non-state providers required to renew their license on a regular basis? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Incentives for Non-State Providers [*] |
ESTABLISHED |
||||
| Does the ministry or its agencies use non-financial incentives to encourage non-state training provision? | Oui | ||||
| What do these non-financial incentives consist of? | Accès aux services d'accompagnement (ex. informations, formation des formateurs, etc.) | ||||
| Does the ministry use financial incentives to encourage non-state training provision? | Commentaires (le cas échéant) | ||||
| What do these financial incentives consist of? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Quality Assurance of Non-State Training Provision [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| Are measures in place to assure the quality of non-state training provision? | L'opérateur transmet un rapport à l'autorité responsable sur une base périodique, Oui | ||||
| Please indicate the features of these measures for quality assurance: | L'autorité responsable (ou fait mener) des audits des audits inopinés | ||||
| Are measures taken to address quality issues in lagging institutions? | L'opérateur est placé sous surveillance et/ou en redressement., Oui | ||||
| Please indicate the specific measures for the lagging institutions: | On retire le permis d'exploitation et/ou l'autorisation de recevoir un financement public quelconque. | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Review of Policies towards Non-State Training Provision [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| Has the government reviewed its policies regarding non-state training provision? | Il s'agit d'évaluations ad hoc, Oui | ||||
| What is/was the nature of the review(s)? | |||||
| Please provide an example of a recent review: | Evaluation des établissements d'enseignement privé supérieur, décembre 2013 - février 2014 | ||||
| Following the above review, have the policies been adjusted in light of the findings? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Targets and Incentives for Public Training Institutions [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| Are training institutions expected to achieve specific targets for desired WfD outcomes? | |||||
| What specific targets are training institutions expected to achieve? | |||||
| Is a reward system in place for public training institutions that achieve agreed targets? | |||||
| What does the reward system consist of? | |||||
| Do institutions or programs that fail to achieve agreed targets face consequences? | |||||
| How does the ministry respond to institutions or programs that persistently fail to achieve agreed targets? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Autonomy and Accountability of Public Training Institutions [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| Over which of the following functions does the management of public training institutions have authority? | |||||
| Are public training institutions allowed to generate and retain revenues? | Oui, mais seulement quelques types de revenus | ||||
| Are public training institutions governed by a board to which management is accountable? | Oui, la plupart des établissements | ||||
| How are complaints regarding the management of training institutions addressed? | Des procédures sont mises en place de manière ad hoc pour recevoir des plaintes. | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Introduction and Closure of Public Training Programs [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| Introduction of Programs | |||||
| What best describes the ministry's or agency's process for approving new programs? | |||||
| Which of the following influences or informs decisions on the introduction of major programs? | |||||
| Please indicate two major new programs that were introduced within the last five years: (Select the most recent major programs) | |||||
| Notes, if any, on introducing programs: | |||||
| Closure of Programs | |||||
| Does the ministry (or relevant agency under the ministry) conduct system-wide assessments to identify publicly-funded programs for closure? | |||||
| Which of the following informs decisions on the closure of major programs? | |||||
| Please indicate two major programs that have been closed within the last five years: | |||||
| Notes, if any, on closing programs: | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| |
Emerging |
||||
|
Chad |
|||||
| Links between Training Institutions and Industry [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| What links exist between training institutions and industry to improve training relevance and quality? | Il existe peu ou pas de partenariats. | ||||
| What is the scope of the formal links? | |||||
| In what areas have significant links been established? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Industry Role in the Design of Program Curricula [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| Do industry experts provide inputs into the design of the curricula of publicly-funded training programs? | Non , Oui, de manière formelle | ||||
| To what extent do industry experts exercise this role? | Dans le cadre de la plupart des partenariats | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Industry Role in the Specification of Facility Standards [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| Do industry experts provide inputs into the specification of facility standards for publicly-funded programs? | Non | ||||
| In what areas do industry experts have a role in the specification of facility standards? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Links between Training and Research Institutions [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| What links exist between training and research institutions? | Il existe peu ou pas de partenariats. , Il existe des partenariats informels. | ||||
| In what areas have links led to significant collaboration? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Recruitment and In-Service Training of Heads of Public Training Institutions [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| Do explicit standards exist for the recruitment of the heads of these institutions? | Non , Oui | ||||
| Please indicate the criteria that heads must satisfy: | Autre - donnez les détails :, Il s'agit de critères basés sur une certification académique minimum (ex. attestation, certificat, diplôme). | ||||
| Do heads have opportunities to participate in in-service training or professional development? | Peu ou pas du tout | ||||
| What types of in-service or professional development opportunities are available to heads? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Recruitment and In-Service Training of Instructors of Public Training Institutions [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| Do explicit standards exist for the recruitment of the instructors of these institutions? | Oui | ||||
| Please indicate the criteria that instructors must satisfy: | Il s'agit de critères basés sur une certification académique minimum (ex. attestation, certificat, diplôme). | ||||
| Do instructors have opportunities to participate in in-service training or professional development? | Peu ou pas du tout | ||||
| What types of in-service or professional development opportunities are routinely available to instructors? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| |
Latent |
||||
|
Chad |
|||||
| Administrative Data from Training Providers |
EMERGING |
||||
| Are public training providers required to report specific data? | Oui | ||||
| What data are public training providers required to report? | Données administratives (effectifs, personnels, budgets, etc.), Données sur le nombre de lauréats et le taux de diplômation | ||||
| Do public training providers produce annual reports? | Autre - donnez les détails : | ||||
| Are non-state training providers required to report administrative data (enrollments, staffing, etc.)? | Oui, tous les opérateurs sont tenus de fournir des données au ministère. | ||||
| What best describes the completeness of reporting by non-state training providers? | La plupart des opérateurs fournissent les données requises. | ||||
| How are data from training providers organized and maintained? | Les données sont stockées dans un système d'informations intégré et centralisé. | ||||
| What is the latest year for which system-wide data are available? | Les données par Ministère de tutelles sont traitées et intégrées dans un système centralisé, chaque année | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Survey and Other Data |
LATENT |
||||
| Does the ministry or agency conduct or sponsor periodic surveys of special topics or issues? | Non | ||||
| Provide two examples of major surveys conducted or sponsored by the ministry or agency in recent years: | |||||
| Does the ministry or agency conduct or sponsor impact evaluations of major programs? | Non | ||||
| Provide two examples of impact evaluations conducted or sponsored by the ministry or agency in recent years: | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Use of Data to Monitor and Improve Program and System Performance |
LATENT |
||||
| What best describes how the ministry or agency uses the administrative data reported by training providers? | Autre - donnez les détails : | ||||
| How has the ministry or agency used the results of the special surveys and impact evaluations listed above? | |||||
| Does the ministry or agency publish information on the employment and earnings of the graduates of training programs? | Aucune information n'est publiée. | ||||
| Is the above information available online to all users, including potential trainees? | Non | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: |