Workforce Development Ratings and Data
A description of the Workforce Development scoring methodology and the meaning of categorical ratings displayed below are available in evidence-based frameworks.
Please Wait.......
A description of the Workforce Development scoring methodology and the meaning of categorical ratings displayed below are available in evidence-based frameworks.
|
|||||
|
West Bank and Gaza
Country Report 2014 |
|||||
|
|
Emerging |
||||
| |
Emerging |
||||
|
West Bank and Gaza |
|||||
| Advocacy for WfD to Support Economic Development |
EMERGING |
||||
| Are there visible champions advocating for WfD to support economic development? | Yes | ||||
| Who are the champions of WfD in government? | Political leaders at the national level, High-level government officials | ||||
| Which of the following best describes the advocacy exercised by the above champions? | Ad-hoc or fragmented advocacy | ||||
| Who are the non-government champions of WfD? | Business or Industry leaders, GIZ leads work at the system level. ILO, BTC, SDC, EU, and others also play an important role. | ||||
| Which of the following best describes the advocacy exercised by the non-government champions? | Ad-hoc or fragmented advocacy | ||||
| How do the champions for WfD engage in dialogue on the WfD policy agenda? | Routinely through institutionalized arrangements | ||||
| Has advocacy and dialogue among the champions led to collaboration on the WfD policy agenda? | Led to cooperation on developing standards and common curricula | ||||
| Strategic Focus and Decisions by the WfD Champions |
EMERGING |
||||
| Which of the following broad areas for WfD have the champions emphasized as priorities to support economic and social development: | Basic education, General secondary education | ||||
| Which of the following more specific areas for WfD have the champions emphasized as priorities to support economic and social development: | Initial vocational education and training (IVET) at the secondary and post-secondary levels, Targeted training for vulnerable populations (e.g. unemployed, women, at-risk youth) | ||||
| Regarding the more specific areas, have the champions for WfD made strategic decisions over the last five years? | Yes | ||||
| What did the strategic decisions consist of? | Creating or reforming organizational structures for WfD policy development (e.g. policy research institutes, regulatory bodies), The strategy also to a less degree touched upon the regulatory framework and the launching of new initiatives to support implementation. | ||||
| How are the WfD champions monitoring implementation progress of the above strategic decisions? | No monitoring and review | ||||
| |
Latent |
||||
|
West Bank and Gaza |
|||||
| Overall Assessment of Economic Prospects and Skills Implications |
EMERGING |
||||
| Has there been a formal assessment(s) of the country's economic prospects and their implications for skills? | Yes | ||||
| What is the nature of the studies and assessments? | Occasional or special studies and assessments | ||||
| What is the scope of the assessment(s): | Looked at all economic sectors in 4 governorates only (Hebron, Bethlehem, Ramallah, and Nablus). | ||||
| Please indicate all sources of data that informed the assessment(s): | Employer and industry surveys, Labor force surveys, Tracer studies | ||||
| Please select all parties that sponsor or conduct these studies and assessments: | Government agencies, Non-state WfD stakeholders, Independent national organizations (e.g. universities, research institutions, think tanks) | ||||
| Critical Skills Constraints in Priority Economic Sectors |
LATENT |
||||
| List below three of the country's priority economic sectors: | Tourism, Agriculture, Manufacturing | ||||
| Have the government or WfD stakeholders identified critical skills constraints in these priority sectors? | No | ||||
| How were the skills constraints identified in these priority sectors? | |||||
| What describes the key measures being taken to address skills constraints in these priority sectors? | |||||
| Are the previously identified WfD champions closely associated with the above key measures to address skills constraints in the priority sectors? | |||||
| Role of Employers and Industry |
EMERGING |
||||
| Do employers and industry have a role in defining strategic WfD priorities for the country or region? | Yes | ||||
| How do employers and industry provide inputs in setting strategic WfD priorities? | Through routine, formal meetings of the designated officials, supplemented by other meetings when needed | ||||
| List two major policy or investment decisions with WfD implications in the past three years that have benefitted from employer and industry input: | Implementing the EU-Funded GIZ-Managed TVET Program, Implementing the BTC TVET Project | ||||
| In what ways are employers and industry helping to address the skills implications of the above two policy/investment decisions? | Increasing hosting of internships, apprenticeships, and other work-based learning, Supporting curriculum development | ||||
| What best describes the depth of engagement by employers and industry in the areas selected above? | Significant | ||||
| Skills-upgrading Incentives for Employers |
LATENT |
||||
| Does the government provide incentives for formal sector employers to develop and upgrade skills? | No | ||||
| Does the country have a levy-grant scheme for training for formal sector employers? | |||||
| Is an annual report publicly available on the operations of the levy-grant scheme? | |||||
| What other government incentives for skills upgrading exist for formal sector employers? | |||||
| Identify two major programs benefitting formal sector employers that feature the incentives listed above: | |||||
| Does the government provide support for informal sector businesses to develop and upgrade skills? | No | ||||
| What government support for skills upgrading is provided for informal sector businesses? | |||||
| Identify two major programs benefitting informal sector businesses that feature the government support listed above: | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Monitoring of the Incentive Programs |
LATENT |
||||
| Name of Program 1: | |||||
| Date started: | |||||
| Has this program been reviewed for impact on skills and productivity? | |||||
| Is the review process systematic and routine? | |||||
| Please provide the date of the last review below: | |||||
| What best describes the follow-up to the review? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this program: | |||||
| Name of Program 2: | |||||
| Date started: | |||||
| Has this program been reviewed for impact on skills and productivity? | |||||
| Is the review process systematic and routine? | |||||
| Please provide the date of the last review below: | |||||
| What best describes the follow-up to the review? | |||||
| |
Emerging |
||||
|
West Bank and Gaza |
|||||
| Roles of Government Ministries and Agencies |
EMERGING |
||||
| Which of the following have legally-defined roles and responsibilities for WfD? | Ministry of Education or equivalent, Ministry of Labor or equivalent, UNRWA | ||||
| What best describes the degree of overlap in the mandates of the above entities? | Overlaps in multiple areas of policy and service provision | ||||
| Do mechanisms exist to ensure coordination of WfD strategies and programs across ministries and agencies? | Yes, ad-hoc mechanisms only | ||||
| Roles of Non-Government WfD Stakeholders |
EMERGING |
||||
| Do non-government WfD stakeholders have legally-defined roles and responsibilities? | Yes | ||||
| Which of the following non-government WfD stakeholders have legally-defined roles and responsibilities? | Employers and industry groups, Civil society organizations | ||||
| Do mechanisms exist for coordination between government entities and non-government WfD stakeholders? | Yes, ad-hoc mechanisms only | ||||
| Coordination for the Implementation of Strategic WfD Measures |
EMERGING |
||||
| Please list two major initiatives or programs closely associated with the previously identified WfD champions that address skills constraints in the priority economic sectors | EU Support to TVET Development | ||||
| Please answer the following questions for the more important of the above two measures. | |||||
| Is the above measure accompanied by an implementation plan? | Yes | ||||
| Is the above measure accompanied by a budget allocation? | Yes | ||||
| Indicate below all key entities with responsibility for implementing the above measure: | Ministry of Education or equivalent, Ministry of Labor or equivalent, Governors' Offices, Employers and training providers | ||||
| How do the above entities coordinate the implementation of the above measure? | Through institutionalized processes, supplemented by ad-hoc arrangements as needed | ||||
| How is implementation progress for this measure monitored? | Through routine reporting arrangements | ||||
| Have the most successful features of this measure been mainstreamed into the formal WfD system? | No | ||||
|
|
Emerging |
||||
| |
Emerging |
||||
|
West Bank and Gaza |
|||||
| Overview of Funding for WfD | |||||
| How does the government mobilize funds for WfD? | General taxation, Through mobilizing and directing donor funds to support WfD projects. | ||||
| Which of the following types of training receive financial support from the government? | Initial vocational education and training (IVET), Training-related active labor market programs (ALMPs) | ||||
| For decisions on capital investments by the government, which ministry(s) is directly responsible? | |||||
| Initial Vocational Education and Training (IVET) | Ministry of Education, Ministry of Labor, Ministry of Finance | ||||
| Continuing Vocational Education and Training (CVET) | CVET is almost non-existent except at the level of continuing education departments at universities. Capital and other investment decisions are made by the specific university. | ||||
| Training-related active labor market programs (ALMPs) | Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Social Affairs and Ministry of Ex-Detainnees. | ||||
| For decisions on spending on salaries (including hiring decisions), which ministry is directly responsible? | |||||
| Initial Vocational Education and Training (IVET) | Ministry of Education, Ministry of Labor, Ministry of Finance, The General Personnel Council is partly responsible as well. No hiring can take place without MOF approval and financial allocation. | ||||
| Continuing Vocational Education and Training (CVET) | Salary and non-salary operational spending to deliver the training is decided by MOF taking into account budget requests from the specific ministry. | ||||
| Training-related active labor market programs (ALMPs) | Ministry of Finance, Governors Offices | ||||
| For decisions on non-salary operational spending to deliver training services, which ministry is directly responsible? | |||||
| Initial Vocational Education and Training (IVET), if relevant | Ministry of Education, Ministry of Labor, Ministry of Finance | ||||
| Continuing Vocational Education and Training (CVET), if relevant | |||||
| Training-related active labor market programs (ALMPs), if relevant | Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Social Affairs and Ministry of Ex-Detainnees | ||||
| What is the main mechanism used by the government to provide recurrent funding for training? | |||||
| Initial Vocational Education and Training (IVET), if relevant | Budget allocations to training providers (e.g. training institutions, employers involved in apprenticeship programs, etc.) | ||||
| Continuing Vocational Education and Training (CVET), if relevant | |||||
| Training-related Active Labor Market Programs (ALMPs), if relevant | Budget allocations to training providers (e.g. training institutions, employers involved in apprenticeship programs, etc.), Subsidized aid to students (e.g. in the form of grants, loans, vouchers provided to trainees) | ||||
| Recurrent Funding for Initial Vocational Education and Training (IVET) [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| Which of the following best describes the ministry's budget process for funding IVET institutions and programs? | Routine annual budgeting | ||||
| What criteria are used to determine funding allocation to IVET institutions and programs? | Previous year's budget, Enrollment | ||||
| Are the criteria for allocating WfD funding to institutions and programs subject to periodic review? | No | ||||
| Provide two examples of major reforms in the last five years to improve efficiency and equity in funding allocations: | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Recurrent Funding for Continuing Vocational Education and Training Programs (CVET) |
LATENT |
||||
| Indicate below the ministries or agencies responsible for CVET, listing the lead entity first: | There is no ministry / agency responsible for CVET. The Adult Education strategy calls for the establishment of a National Commission for Adult Education | ||||
| How is recurrent funding for CVET programs decided? | CVET is mainly provided by Continuing Education Dpertments / Centers at universities. Funding comes mainly from students fees. Some programs are financed by external donors. | ||||
| Are training providers provided with incentives to seek and to retain accreditation? | |||||
| Does the ministry or agency produce an annual report? | |||||
| What is the latest year for which the report is available? | |||||
| Please name two on-going or recent government-supported programs to foster on-the-job training (OJT) in small and medium sized firms (SMEs): | |||||
| Have these programs been reviewed for their impact? | |||||
| Have the reviews led to changes in program funding or design? | |||||
| Please name two on-going or recent programs to support individual career or professional development (e.g. reskilling or upgrading skills): | |||||
| Have these programs been reviewed for their impact? | |||||
| Have the reviews led to changes in program funding or design? | |||||
| Recurrent Funding for Training-related Active Labor Market Programs (ALMPs) |
ESTABLISHED |
||||
| Indicate below the ministries or agencies responsible for training-related ALMPs, listing the lead entity first: | UNRWA, MOSA, Ministry of Ex-Detainees | ||||
| Who are the beneficiaries of training-related ALMPs supported by government funding? | Youth, Refugees, Youth from difficult social backgrounds, and ex-detainees. The PDP allocates considerable allocations for training of the unemployed, but nothing is seen on the ground in terms of implementation. | ||||
| Please indicate two major training-related ALMPs supported by government funding: | Ex-Detainees Rehabilitation Program, Youth of Difficult Social Background Rehabilitation | ||||
| How is funding for the above two programs decided? | Through a formal, systematic process | ||||
| Who is involved in this process? | Only officials in the sponsoring ministry or agency | ||||
| How is training provision implemented? | In-house training provision, Contracting service providers through a competitive process | ||||
| Have these programs been formally reviewed for their impact? | Yes | ||||
| Have the reviews led to changes in program funding or design? | All new phases of the Ex-Detainees Rehabilitation Program were designed based on the findings and recommendations of conducted reviews | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Equity in Funding for Training Programs (IVET) |
EMERGING |
||||
| In the last five years, has there been a formal review(s) of the impact of WfD funding on the beneficiaries of training programs? | Yes | ||||
| Please provide two examples of reviews conducted in the last five years: | Compatibility of the Palestinian Vocational Secondary Education with the Labour Market | ||||
| Which of the following outcomes by socioeconomic group did the review(s) consider? | Enrollments, Completion of training, Employment | ||||
| Which of the following parties participated in dialogue on the findings of the above review(s) and their implications: | Government agencies | ||||
| What has been the follow-up to the above review(s)? | Some recommendations were implemented | ||||
| Equity in Funding for Training Programs (CVET) |
LATENT |
||||
| Continuing Vocational Education and Training (CVET) | |||||
| In the last five years, has there been a formal review(s) of the impact of WfD funding on the beneficiaries of training programs? | No | ||||
| Please provide two examples of reviews conducted in the last five years: | |||||
| Which of the following outcomes by socioeconomic group did the review(s) consider? | |||||
| Which of the following parties participated in dialogue on the findings of the above review(s) and their implications: | |||||
| What has been the follow-up to the above review(s)? | |||||
| Notes, if any: | |||||
| Equity in Funding for Training Programs (ALMPs) |
ESTABLISHED |
||||
| Training-related Active Labor Market Programs (ALMPs) | |||||
| In the last five years, has there been a formal review(s) of the impact of WfD funding on the beneficiaries of training programs? | Yes | ||||
| Please provide two examples of reviews conducted in the last five years: | |||||
| Which of the following outcomes by socioeconomic group did the review(s) consider? | Enrollments, Completion of training, Employment, Earnings | ||||
| Which of the following parties participated in dialogue on the findings of the above review(s) and their implications: | Government agencies, Donor agencies including SDC and the EC. | ||||
| What has been the follow-up to the above review(s)? | Key recommendations were implemented | ||||
| Partnerships between Training Providers and Employers |
ESTABLISHED |
||||
| Does the government facilitate such partnerships through formal arrangements? | Yes | ||||
| At what levels have the partnerships been institutionalized? | Regional or district | ||||
| What benefits do the participating employers get from partnerships with training providers? | Access to training facilities and personnel, Access to potential new hires, Influence over content of training, Influence over testing of trainees, Contribution to the development of standards and curricula | ||||
| Please name below two major employers, and the resources that they provide for WfD: | |||||
| Name of Employer 1, please indicate below: | Royal Industries - Hebron | ||||
| What resources does this employer provide? | Technical knowledge, Technical personnel, Provision of work exposure (e.g., internships and on-the-job training), Job fairs to help graduates find jobs. | ||||
| Name of Employer 2, please indicate below: | Al Quds Restaurant - Hebron | ||||
| What resources does this employer provide? | Technical knowledge, Management guidance and governance, Provision of work exposure (e.g., internships and on-the-job training) | ||||
| |
Latent |
||||
|
West Bank and Gaza |
|||||
| Competency Standards and National Qualifications Frameworks |
EMERGING |
||||
| Indicate below the ministries or agencies, if any, with oversight responsibility for competency standards and/or the national qualifications framework (NQF), listing the lead entity first | Ministry of Education, Ministry of Higher Education, Ministry of Labor | ||||
| Have competency standards for occupations been defined? | Yes, for a few occupations | ||||
| Is a national qualifications framework (NQF) in place? | No, but a process to develop a NQF has been launched | ||||
| What is the occupational coverage of the NQF? | Covers most occupations | ||||
| What range of skill levels does the NQF cover? | Wide range of semi-skilled to professional skill levels | ||||
| Which of the following parties are involved in policy dialogue on competency standards and/or the NQF? | Training providers, Employers or industry associations, Labor unions, National professional bodies - GNTA was involved in all tourism related professions, Government ministries or specialized agencies, GIZ leads work at the system level. ILO, BTC, SDC, EU, and others also play an important role. | ||||
| What best characterizes the policy dialogue on competency standards and/or the NQF? | Takes place routinely through institutionalized arrangements | ||||
| Competency Standards for Major Occupations |
LATENT |
||||
| Please indicate two major skilled or semi-skilled occupations (i.e. dominant or fastest-growing): | Car Electricity and Electronics, Electrical Installation | ||||
| Occupation 1: | |||||
| Who is involved in setting the competency standards? | Training providers, Employers or industry associations, Labor unions, National professional bodies, Government ministries or specialized agencies (e.g. South Africa's SAQA) | ||||
| Do training providers for this occupation utilize competency-based curricula aligned to the standards formally agreed upon by the above stakeholders? | No | ||||
| Occupation 2: | |||||
| Who is involved in setting the competency standards? | Training providers, Employers or industry associations, Labor unions, National professional bodies, Government ministries or specialized agencies (e.g. South Africa's SAQA) | ||||
| Do training providers for this occupation utilize competency-based curricula as defined by standards formally agreed upon by the above stakeholders? | No | ||||
| Occupational Skills Testing |
LATENT |
||||
| Is competency-based testing used to certify qualifications in skilled and semi-skilled occupations? | No | ||||
| Which of the following describes the system for competency-based testing? | |||||
| Indicate below the ministry(s) or agency(s) with oversight responsibility for competency-based testing, listing the lead entity first: | |||||
| Which of the following best describes the volume of testing administered by the lead entity? | |||||
| Has the above entity taken measures in the last three years to manage the cost of skills testing and certification? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Skills Testing and Certification |
LATENT |
||||
| List below two of the most common certificates (exclude those required for licensing): | |||||
| What best describes the public's confidence in the above certificates? | |||||
| Certificate 1: | |||||
| Certificate 2: | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Skills Testing for Major Occupations |
LATENT |
||||
| List two major skilled or semi-skilled occupations (i.e. dominant or fastest-growing): | |||||
| Occupation 1: | |||||
| What best describes the focus of the tests? | |||||
| Is a certificate awarded upon successful completion of the tests? | |||||
| Is a certificate required for practitioners of this occupation? | |||||
| Does having a certificate improve employability and earnings in this occupation? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on skills testing for occupation 1: | |||||
| Occupation 2: | |||||
| What best describes the focus of the tests? | |||||
| Is a certificate awarded upon successful completion of the tests? | |||||
| Is a certificate required for practitioners of this occupation? | |||||
| Does having a certificate improve employment and earnings in this occupation? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on skills testing for occupation 2: | |||||
| Government Oversight of Accreditation | |||||
| Accreditation of Training Providers | |||||
| Is a system in place to accredit training providers? | Yes | ||||
| Please indicate the government ministries or agencies that exercise this function: | Ministry of Education, Ministry of Labor, Independent accreditation authority(s), Acreditation and Quality Assurance Commission (AQAC) for accrediting higher education programs and institutions | ||||
| Accreditation of Training Programs | |||||
| Is a system in place to accredit training programs? | Yes | ||||
| Please indicate the government ministries or agencies that exercise this function: | Ministry of Education, Independent accreditation authority(s), Acreditation and Quality Assurance Commission (AQAC) for acrediting higher education programs and institutions. | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Establishment of Accreditation Standards [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| What entity establishes the accreditation standards for training providers? | A designated office in the ministry | ||||
| How does the above entity establish accreditation standards for training providers? | Internal consultations only | ||||
| Are accreditation standards periodically reviewed? | Yes, on an ad-hoc basis | ||||
| Do these protocols involve formal input from external bodies? | No | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Accreditation Requirements and Enforcement of Accreditation Standards [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| What types of providers are required to obtain accreditation? | Private providers only | ||||
| Are accredited providers required to renew their accreditation status on a regular basis? | Yes | ||||
| Are accreditation standards publicized? | Yes | ||||
| Are accreditation standards enforced? | Yes, to a large extent | ||||
| Why are accreditation standards not enforced? | |||||
| Incentives and Support for Accreditation [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| Are training providers provided with incentives to seek and to retain accreditation? | Yes | ||||
| What types of incentives are provided to training providers? | Linking accreditation to obtaining license to operate | ||||
| Are training providers provided with support to seek and to retain accreditation? | Yes | ||||
| What type of support is provided to training providers? | Technical assistance to meet accreditation standards | ||||
| |
Emerging |
||||
|
West Bank and Gaza |
|||||
| Learning Pathways [*] |
ESTABLISHED |
||||
| Are separate academic and vocational/technical streams offered at the secondary level? | Yes | ||||
| In what year of schooling does the streaming begin? | After 8-10 years of schooling | ||||
| What are the options for technical and vocational education and training at the post-secondary level? | Polytechnics, community/technical colleges, Technical programs within universities | ||||
| Can graduates of secondary vocational/technical streams progress to post-secondary levels of study? | Yes, only to vocationally-oriented programs | ||||
| Can graduates of post-secondary vocational/technical programs (e.g. polytechnics, community colleges) progress to university programs? | Yes, only to selected programs | ||||
| Public Perception of Pathways for TVET [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| Has the government taken action to improve public perception of TVET? | Yes | ||||
| What do these actions consist of? | Improving the quality and relevance of programs, Diversifying learning pathways for progression to higher levels of education and training | ||||
| Regarding diversifying pathways, has the government taken major actions in the last 10 years? | Yes | ||||
| List two of the most important of these government actions to diversify pathways: | Enabling graduates of the applied vocational stream to sit for additional examination within two years from their graduation qualifying them to further pursue their higher education | ||||
| Have these actions been monitored or reviewed for their impact on diversifying learning pathways? | No | ||||
| What best describes the review process? | |||||
| Has the above review led to changes in policies to diversify learning pathways? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Articulation of Skills Certification [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| Are certificates awarded for completing technical/vocational training programs recognized in the national qualifications framework? | |||||
| Do training providers under ministries other than Education offer programs leading to the award of formal qualifications? | Yes | ||||
| Are the qualifications awarded by non-Education ministries recognized for admission into formal education and training programs under the Ministry of Education? | No | ||||
| List below five common qualifications awarded by non-Education ministries that are recognized for admission into formal education and training programs under the Ministry of Education: | |||||
| List below the qualifications from above that are recognized with the granting of credit: | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Recognition of Prior Learning [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| How have policy makers addressed issues pertaining to the recognition of prior learning (RPL)? | Limited or no attention | ||||
| Does a national organization exist dedicated to adult learning and related issues (e.g. recognition of prior learning)? | No | ||||
| Is recognition of prior learning (RPL) integrated into the national qualifications framework (NQF) or the framework for occupational competency standards? | Yes | ||||
| What best describes the government's outreach to inform the public about the recognition of prior learning? | Limited or no outreach | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Support for Further Occupational and Career Development [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| Indicate below the ministries or agencies that provide or fund services to support further occupational and career development: | |||||
| What describes the scope of publicly-sponsored further occupational and career development services? | Practically none | ||||
| What describes the organization of the above services? | Stand-alone local service units or centers | ||||
| In the last five years, has the government reviewed its policies or programs for further occupational and career development? | No | ||||
| Was the above review part of a routine and institutionalized process? | |||||
| Has the above review led to changes in policies, funding, or the design of services for further occupational and career development? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Training-related Provision of Services for the Disadvantaged [*] |
ADVANCED |
||||
| Are publicly-funded training programs available for disadvantaged populations? | Yes | ||||
| Indicate below the ministries or agencies that oversee the above programs, listing the lead entity first: | UNRWA; MOSA; Ministry of Ex-Detainees. | ||||
| How does the lead ministry or agency support publicly-funded training programs for disadvantaged populations? | Systematic, routine support | ||||
| Please indicate below the nature of the systematic support: | Annual budget, Adequate institutional infrastructure for implementation, Multi-year programmatic budget | ||||
| Indicate below two major programs addressing the training needs of disadvantaged populations: | Rehabilitation of Ex-Detainees, Rehabilitation of Youth of hard backgrounds (School dropouts, orphans, youth in conflict with the law, …) | ||||
| Have these programs been monitored and reviewed for impact? | Yes | ||||
| Are these reviews part of an institutionalized and routine practice? | Yes | ||||
| Following these reviews, have the programs been adjusted in light of the findings? | Yes | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
|
|
Latent |
||||
| |
Emerging |
||||
|
West Bank and Gaza |
|||||
| Scope and Formality of Non-State Training Provision [*] |
ADVANCED |
||||
| Are non-state providers allowed to offer training? (e.g. IVET, CVET, training-related ALMPs) | Yes | ||||
| What types of non-state providers are allowed to offer training? | Domestic non-profit providers, Domestic for-profit providers, Foreign non-profit providers | ||||
| What best describes the composition of training providers? | Consists of a highly diverse mix of providers | ||||
| Does an association of private training providers exist? | Yes | ||||
| Briefly describe this association's membership, governance structure, and its role in policy dialogue with the government: | |||||
| What best describes the registration status of non-state training providers? | Most are registered | ||||
| Are non-state providers required to renew their registration on a regular basis? | Yes | ||||
| What best describes the licensing status of non-state training providers? | Most are licensed | ||||
| Are non-state providers required to renew their license on a regular basis? | Yes | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Incentives for Non-State Providers [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| Does the ministry or its agencies use non-financial incentives to encourage non-state training provision? | Yes | ||||
| What do these non-financial incentives consist of? | License to operate, Authorization to issue government-recognized certificates and diplomas | ||||
| Does the ministry use financial incentives to encourage non-state training provision? | Yes | ||||
| What do these financial incentives consist of? | Eligibility to receive or compete for training grants, Non-state training providers are not eligible for government funds. Donor funds are in general granted to state and non-state providers; which is done with government direction, agreement and oversight. | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Quality Assurance of Non-State Training Provision [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| Are measures in place to assure the quality of non-state training provision? | No | ||||
| Please indicate the features of these measures for quality assurance: | |||||
| Are measures taken to address quality issues in lagging institutions? | |||||
| Please indicate the specific measures for the lagging institutions: | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Review of Policies towards Non-State Training Provision [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| Has the government reviewed its policies regarding non-state training provision? | No | ||||
| What is/was the nature of the review(s)? | |||||
| Please provide an example of a recent review: | |||||
| Following the above review, have the policies been adjusted in light of the findings? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Targets and Incentives for Public Training Institutions [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| Are training institutions expected to achieve specific targets for desired WfD outcomes? | No | ||||
| What specific targets are training institutions expected to achieve? | Institutions are usually encouraged to increase enrollment | ||||
| Is a reward system in place for public training institutions that achieve agreed targets? | |||||
| What does the reward system consist of? | |||||
| Do institutions or programs that fail to achieve agreed targets face consequences? | |||||
| How does the ministry respond to institutions or programs that persistently fail to achieve agreed targets? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Autonomy and Accountability of Public Training Institutions [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| Over which of the following functions does the management of public training institutions have authority? | Selection and admission of trainees, Purchases of training materials and other inputs | ||||
| Are public training institutions allowed to generate and retain revenues? | No | ||||
| Are public training institutions governed by a board to which management is accountable? | No | ||||
| How are complaints regarding the management of training institutions addressed? | A functioning system is in place | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Introduction and Closure of Public Training Programs [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| Introduction of Programs | |||||
| What best describes the ministry's or agency's process for approving new programs? | Ad-hoc | ||||
| Which of the following influences or informs decisions on the introduction of major programs? | Capacity for training provision (e.g., staff, equipment, facilities, etc.), Analytical findings (e.g. labor market analyses, impact evaluations), If the curriculum directorate approves the curriculum proposed by the institution, then the program is usually endorsed for introduction. | ||||
| Please indicate two major new programs that were introduced within the last five years: (Select the most recent major programs) | Mechatronics, Smart Building Technology; Industrial equipment maintenance; Beauty Care | ||||
| Notes, if any, on introducing programs: | |||||
| Closure of Programs | |||||
| Does the ministry (or relevant agency under the ministry) conduct system-wide assessments to identify publicly-funded programs for closure? | Yes, on an ad-hoc basis | ||||
| Which of the following informs decisions on the closure of major programs? | Findings from reviews of programs (e.g. enrollment trends) | ||||
| Please indicate two major programs that have been closed within the last five years: | Radio and TV | ||||
| Notes, if any, on closing programs: | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| |
Latent |
||||
|
West Bank and Gaza |
|||||
| Links between Training Institutions and Industry [*] |
EMERGING |
||||
| What links exist between training institutions and industry to improve training relevance and quality? | Informal links exist | ||||
| What is the scope of the formal links? | Links exist between most training institutions and industry(ies) | ||||
| In what areas have significant links been established? | Training of workers from business and industry in school facilities and with school instructors in collaboration with Chambers of Commerce and trade unions and others., Industry internships or training for trainees | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Industry Role in the Design of Program Curricula [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| Do industry experts provide inputs into the design of the curricula of publicly-funded training programs? | No | ||||
| To what extent do industry experts exercise this role? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Industry Role in the Specification of Facility Standards [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| Do industry experts provide inputs into the specification of facility standards for publicly-funded programs? | No | ||||
| In what areas do industry experts have a role in the specification of facility standards? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Links between Training and Research Institutions [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| What links exist between training and research institutions? | Informal links exist | ||||
| In what areas have links led to significant collaboration? | Some graduate students from universities conduct research at VSSs | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Recruitment and In-Service Training of Heads of Public Training Institutions [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| Do explicit standards exist for the recruitment of the heads of these institutions? | Yes | ||||
| Please indicate the criteria that heads must satisfy: | Minimum academic qualifications (e.g., certificates, diplomas, and degrees), Minimum years of teaching experience, Management experience / training | ||||
| Do heads have opportunities to participate in in-service training or professional development? | Yes, once every few years | ||||
| What types of in-service or professional development opportunities are available to heads? | Seminars, workshops, and conferences | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Recruitment and In-Service Training of Instructors of Public Training Institutions [*] |
LATENT |
||||
| Do explicit standards exist for the recruitment of the instructors of these institutions? | Yes | ||||
| Please indicate the criteria that instructors must satisfy: | Minimum academic qualifications (e.g., certificates, diplomas, and degrees), Minimum years of industry or work experience | ||||
| Do instructors have opportunities to participate in in-service training or professional development? | Yes, once every few years | ||||
| What types of in-service or professional development opportunities are routinely available to instructors? | Seminars, workshops, and conferences, Formal courses | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| |
Latent |
||||
|
West Bank and Gaza |
|||||
| Administrative Data from Training Providers |
EMERGING |
||||
| Are public training providers required to report specific data? | Yes | ||||
| What data are public training providers required to report? | Administrative data (enrollments, staffing, budgets, etc.), Graduation statistics | ||||
| Do public training providers produce annual reports? | Yes, most institutions produce reports for internal use | ||||
| Are non-state training providers required to report administrative data (enrollments, staffing, etc.)? | Yes, all are required | ||||
| What best describes the completeness of reporting by non-state training providers? | Some providers supply the required data | ||||
| How are data from training providers organized and maintained? | Data are submitted to the ministry or agency but are not maintained in centralized databases | ||||
| What is the latest year for which system-wide data are available? | Data on students, graduates, and staff available at a system-wide level since around 20 years | ||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Survey and Other Data |
LATENT |
||||
| Does the ministry or agency conduct or sponsor periodic surveys of special topics or issues? | No | ||||
| Provide two examples of major surveys conducted or sponsored by the ministry or agency in recent years: | |||||
| Does the ministry or agency conduct or sponsor impact evaluations of major programs? | No | ||||
| Provide two examples of impact evaluations conducted or sponsored by the ministry or agency in recent years: | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: | |||||
| Use of Data to Monitor and Improve Program and System Performance |
LATENT |
||||
| What best describes how the ministry or agency uses the administrative data reported by training providers? | Rarely used | ||||
| How has the ministry or agency used the results of the special surveys and impact evaluations listed above? | Data on enrollment, graduates, and staff are used to produce the annual statistical report. Finanical and management data are reviewed by the ministry, which might request clarification from training providers if needed. | ||||
| Does the ministry or agency publish information on the employment and earnings of the graduates of training programs? | No | ||||
| Is the above information available online to all users, including potential trainees? | |||||
| Notes, if any, on this topic: |