Enabling Context and System Alignment |
Established
|
 |  |  |  |
| |
Pakistan
|
|
Setting clear guidelines for classroom assessment:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Policy document |
There is an informal system-level document that provides guidelines for classroom assessment.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Availability |
The availability of the document is restricted.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Aligning classroom assessment with system learning goals:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Resources |
There are some system-wide resources for teachers for classroom assessment.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Curriculum/ Standards |
There is an official curriculum or standards document that specifies what students are expected to learn, but the level of performance required is not clear.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Having effective human resources to carry out classroom assessment activities:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Teacher development |
There are some system-level mechanisms to ensure that teachers develop skills and expertise in classroom assessment.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Assessment Quality |
Emerging
|
 |  |  |  |
| |
Pakistan
|
|
Ensuring the quality of classroom assessment:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Practices |
Classroom assessment practices are known to be weak.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Quality monitoring |
There are no mechanisms to monitor the quality of classroom assessment practices.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Ensuring effective uses of classroom assessment:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Information dissemination |
Classroom assessment information is required to be disseminated to some key stakeholders.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Uses |
There are no required uses of classroom assessment to support student learning.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enabling Context |
Emerging
|
 |  |  |  |
| |
Pakistan
|
|
Setting clear policies:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Stability |
The examination is a stable program that has been operating regularly.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Policy document |
There is a formal policy document that authorizes the examination.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Availability |
The policy document is not available to the public.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Completeness |
The policy document addresses some key aspects of the examination.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Having strong leadership:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Support |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Coordination |
There are independent attempts to improve the examination by stakeholder groups.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Openness to change |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Having regular funding:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Regularity |
There is irregular funding allocated for the examination.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Activities funded |
Funding covers all core examination activities: design, administration, data processing and reporting.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Research and development |
Funding does not cover research and development.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Having strong organizational structures:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Stability of organization |
The examination office is a stable organization.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Accountability |
The examination office is accountable to an external board or agency.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Recognition |
Examination results are recognized by certification or selection system in the country.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Facilities |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Having effective human resources:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Staffing |
The examination office is inadequately staffed to effectively carry out the examination, issues are pervasive.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Preparation |
The country does not offer opportunities that prepare for work on the examination.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
System Alignment |
Emerging
|
 |  |  |  |
| |
Pakistan
|
|
Aligning examinations with learning goals and opportunities to learn:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
What is measured |
There is a clear understanding of what the examination measures.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Acceptance |
What the examination measures is questioned by some stakeholder groups.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Preparation materials |
There is comprehensive material to prepare for the examinations that is accessible to most students.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Providing teachers with opportunities to learn about the examination:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Teacher development |
There are no courses or workshops on examinations available to teachers.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Teacher participation |
Teachers are involved in most examination-related tasks.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Assessment Quality |
Emerging
|
 |  |  |  |
| |
Pakistan
|
|
Ensuring quality:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Technical report |
There is no technical report or other documentation.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Quality assurance |
There are no mechanisms in place to ensure the quality of the examination.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Ensuring fairness:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Inappropriate behavior |
Inappropriate behavior surrounding the examination process is moderate.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Credibility |
The examination results are credible for some stakeholder groups.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Barriers |
A small proportion of students (less than 10%) may not take the examination because of language, gender, or other equivalent barriers.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Using examination information in a fair way:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Uses |
Examination results are used by most stakeholder groups in a proper way.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Confidentiality |
Student names and results are public.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Ensuring positive consequences of the examination:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Options |
There are some options for students who do not perform well on the examination.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Consequences |
There are no mechanisms in place to monitor the consequences of the examination.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enabling Context |
Emerging
|
 |  |  |  |
| |
Pakistan
|
|
Setting clear policies for NLSA:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Stability |
The NLSA has been operating on an irregular basis.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Policy document |
There is an informal or draft policy document that authorizes the NLSA.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Availability |
The policy document is not available to the public.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan |
There is a general understanding that the NLSA will take place.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Having strong public engagement for NLSA:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Support |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Having regular funding for NLSA:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Regularity |
There is regular funding allocated to the NLSA.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Activities funded |
Funding covers all core NLSA activities: design, administration, analysis and reporting.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Research and development |
Funding does not cover research and development activities.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Having strong organizational structures for NLSA:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Stability of organization |
The NLSA office is a permanent agency, institution or unit.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Politics |
Political considerations never hamper technical considerations.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Accountability |
The NLSA office is accountable to a clearly recognized body.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Having effective human resources for NLSA:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Staffing |
The NLSA office is inadequately staffed to effectively carry out the assessment.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Preparation |
The country does not offer opportunities that prepare individuals for work on NLSA.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
System Alignment |
Emerging
|
 |  |  |  |
| |
Pakistan
|
|
Aligning the NLSA with learning goals:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
What is measured |
The NLSA measures performance against curriculum or learning standards.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Acceptance |
What the NLSA measures is questioned by some stakeholder groups.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Quality assurance |
There are regular internal reviews of the NLSA to ensure that it measures what it is intended to measure.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Providing teachers with opportunities to learn about the NLSA:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Teacher development |
There are no courses or workshops on the NLSA.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Assessment Quality |
Emerging
|
 |  |  |  |
| |
Pakistan
|
|
Ensuring the quality of the NLSA:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Inclusion |
At least one option is offered to include all groups of students in the NLSA.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Quality assurance |
There are a variety of mechanisms in place to ensure the quality of the NLSA.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Technical report |
There is some documentation about the technical aspects of the NLSA, but it is not in a formal report format.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Ensuring effective uses of the NLSA:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Dissemination |
NLSA results are poorly disseminated.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Uses |
NLSA information is not used or is used in ways inconsistent with the purposes or the technical characteristics of the assessment.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Consequences |
There are no mechanisms in place to monitor the consequences of the NLSA.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enabling Context |
Latent
|
 |  |  |  |
| |
Pakistan
|
|
Setting clear policies for ILSA:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Past record |
The country/system has not participated in an ILSA in the last 10 years.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Future plans |
The country/system has not taken concrete steps to participate in an ILSA in the next 5 years.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Policy document |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Availability |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Having regular funding for ILSA:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Regularity |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Activities funded |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Research and development |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Having effective human resources for ILSA:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Team |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
National coordinator |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Staffing |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
System Alignment |
Latent
|
 |  |  |  |
| |
Pakistan
|
|
Providing opportunities to learn about ILSA:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
International meetings |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Opportunities to learn |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Beneficiaries |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Assessment Quality |
Latent
|
 |  |  |  |
| |
Pakistan
|
Ensuring the quality of ILSA: |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Standards for publication |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
New knowledge |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Ensuring effective uses of ILSA:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Dissemination |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Feedback to schools |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Media |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Uses |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Impact |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |